public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* gdbserver/ considered a part of binutils?
@ 2020-02-19  2:09 Maciej W. Rozycki
  2020-02-19  2:38 ` Joel Brobecker
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2020-02-19  2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: gdb

Hi Tom,

 It seems like something has to be done with Git hook scriptery to make it 
consider gdbserver/ a part of GDB rather than binutils; gdbsupport/ might 
be similarly affected.  My recent commit spanning gdb/ and gdbserver/ has 
triggered an additional message (beyond one to <gdb-cvs@sourceware.org>) 
posted to <bfd-cvs@sourceware.org>, which shouldn't have happened for such 
a commit.

 Since you have been the person working on this tree restructuring can you 
please figure out what has to be done to get this fixed?

  Maciej

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: gdbserver/ considered a part of binutils?
  2020-02-19  2:09 gdbserver/ considered a part of binutils? Maciej W. Rozycki
@ 2020-02-19  2:38 ` Joel Brobecker
  2020-02-19  3:02   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
  2020-02-19 22:28   ` Tom Tromey
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2020-02-19  2:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maciej W. Rozycki; +Cc: Tom Tromey, gdb

>  It seems like something has to be done with Git hook scriptery to make it 
> consider gdbserver/ a part of GDB rather than binutils; gdbsupport/ might 
> be similarly affected.  My recent commit spanning gdb/ and gdbserver/ has 
> triggered an additional message (beyond one to <gdb-cvs@sourceware.org>) 
> posted to <bfd-cvs@sourceware.org>, which shouldn't have happened for such 
> a commit.

I should be the same message with two recipients, but that's indeed
a good point.  This is something to remember when moving code to
the toplevel dir.

I've modified the script we use to determine which mailing-list to hit,
and marked gdbserver/ and gdbsupport/ as being GDB-only. I did a quick
pass over the current directories at toplevel, and didn't see anything
else. But if there are other directories not created yet that we are
planning on adding, please let me know, and I will take care of it too.

-- 
Joel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: gdbserver/ considered a part of binutils?
  2020-02-19  2:38 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2020-02-19  3:02   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
  2020-02-19 22:28   ` Tom Tromey
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Maciej W. Rozycki @ 2020-02-19  3:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: Tom Tromey, gdb

On Wed, 19 Feb 2020, Joel Brobecker wrote:

> >  It seems like something has to be done with Git hook scriptery to make it 
> > consider gdbserver/ a part of GDB rather than binutils; gdbsupport/ might 
> > be similarly affected.  My recent commit spanning gdb/ and gdbserver/ has 
> > triggered an additional message (beyond one to <gdb-cvs@sourceware.org>) 
> > posted to <bfd-cvs@sourceware.org>, which shouldn't have happened for such 
> > a commit.
> 
> I should be the same message with two recipients, but that's indeed
> a good point.  This is something to remember when moving code to
> the toplevel dir.

 Yes, it's a single original message, but if you're subscribed to both 
mailing lists then you receive two copies of the message as I did.

> I've modified the script we use to determine which mailing-list to hit,
> and marked gdbserver/ and gdbsupport/ as being GDB-only. I did a quick
> pass over the current directories at toplevel, and didn't see anything
> else. But if there are other directories not created yet that we are
> planning on adding, please let me know, and I will take care of it too.

 Great, thanks, also for your sharp-sightedness!

  Maciej

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: gdbserver/ considered a part of binutils?
  2020-02-19  2:38 ` Joel Brobecker
  2020-02-19  3:02   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
@ 2020-02-19 22:28   ` Tom Tromey
  2020-02-20  2:50     ` Joel Brobecker
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2020-02-19 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: Maciej W. Rozycki, Tom Tromey, gdb

Joel> I've modified the script we use to determine which mailing-list to hit,
Joel> and marked gdbserver/ and gdbsupport/ as being GDB-only. I did a quick
Joel> pass over the current directories at toplevel, and didn't see anything
Joel> else.

I think gnulib is only used by gdb.

Joel> But if there are other directories not created yet that we are
Joel> planning on adding, please let me know, and I will take care of it too.

I think we're done for now.  I didn't even think of this, so thanks
Maciej for finding it, and Joel for fixing it.

Tom

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: gdbserver/ considered a part of binutils?
  2020-02-19 22:28   ` Tom Tromey
@ 2020-02-20  2:50     ` Joel Brobecker
  2020-02-20 16:45       ` Tom Tromey
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2020-02-20  2:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: Maciej W. Rozycki, gdb

> Joel> I've modified the script we use to determine which mailing-list to hit,
> Joel> and marked gdbserver/ and gdbsupport/ as being GDB-only. I did a quick
> Joel> pass over the current directories at toplevel, and didn't see anything
> Joel> else.
> 
> I think gnulib is only used by gdb.

Wouldn't binutils want to use it at some point, now that the work
to make it available has been done?

> I think we're done for now.  I didn't even think of this, so thanks
> Maciej for finding it, and Joel for fixing it.

You are welcome!

-- 
Joel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: gdbserver/ considered a part of binutils?
  2020-02-20  2:50     ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2020-02-20 16:45       ` Tom Tromey
  2020-02-21  3:42         ` Joel Brobecker
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2020-02-20 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: Tom Tromey, Maciej W. Rozycki, gdb

>>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> writes:

Joel> I've modified the script we use to determine which mailing-list to hit,
Joel> and marked gdbserver/ and gdbsupport/ as being GDB-only. I did a quick
Joel> pass over the current directories at toplevel, and didn't see anything
Joel> else.
>> 
>> I think gnulib is only used by gdb.

Joel> Wouldn't binutils want to use it at some point, now that the work
Joel> to make it available has been done?

I would hope so, but who knows.
If they don't mind seeing the email, it is fine by me :)

Tom

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: gdbserver/ considered a part of binutils?
  2020-02-20 16:45       ` Tom Tromey
@ 2020-02-21  3:42         ` Joel Brobecker
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2020-02-21  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: Maciej W. Rozycki, gdb

> I would hope so, but who knows.
> If they don't mind seeing the email, it is fine by me :)

I've sent the binutils list a heads up, and asked them if they want
us to filter them out on those. Let's see what they say :).

-- 
Joel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-02-21  3:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-02-19  2:09 gdbserver/ considered a part of binutils? Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-02-19  2:38 ` Joel Brobecker
2020-02-19  3:02   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-02-19 22:28   ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-20  2:50     ` Joel Brobecker
2020-02-20 16:45       ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-21  3:42         ` Joel Brobecker

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).