From: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
To: David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>,
gdb@sourceware.org, elfutils-devel@sourceware.org,
binutils@sourceware.org, Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
Subject: Re: Range lists, zero-length functions, linker gc
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 12:40:40 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200603031040.GD29024@bubble.grove.modra.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAENS6EsMs78YuYnkC458XOBNXJGNurUk4MCHiq-0nRiywN7YLg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 11:06:10AM -0700, David Blaikie via Binutils wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 9:50 AM Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> wrote:
> > where I
> > would argue the compiler simply needs to make sure that if it generates
> > code in separate sections it also should create the DWARF separate
> > section (groups).
>
> I don't think that's practical - the overhead, I believe, is too high.
> Headers for each section contribution (ELF headers but DWARF headers
> moreso - having a separate .debug_addr, .debug_line, etc section for
> each function would be very expensive) would make for very large
> object files.
With a little linker magic I don't see the neccesity of duplicating
the DWARF headers. Taking .debug_line as an example, a compiler could
emit the header, opcode, directory and file tables to a .debug_line
section with line statements for function foo emitted to
.debug_line.foo and for bar to .debug_line.bar, trusting that the
linker will combine these sections in order to create an output
.debug_line section. If foo code is excluded then .debug_line.foo
info will also be dropped if section groups are used.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-03 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-31 18:55 Fangrui Song
2020-05-31 19:15 ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-31 20:10 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-05-31 20:47 ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-31 22:11 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-05-31 23:17 ` David Blaikie
2020-05-31 20:49 ` David Blaikie
2020-05-31 22:29 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-05-31 22:36 ` David Blaikie
2020-06-01 9:31 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-06-01 20:18 ` David Blaikie
2020-06-02 16:50 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-06-02 18:06 ` David Blaikie
2020-06-03 3:10 ` Alan Modra [this message]
2020-06-03 4:06 ` Fangrui Song
2020-06-03 21:50 ` David Blaikie
2020-06-09 20:24 ` Tombstone values in debug sections (was: Range lists, zero-length functions, linker gc) Fangrui Song
2020-06-19 20:04 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-06-20 1:02 ` David Blaikie
2020-06-19 12:00 ` Range lists, zero-length functions, linker gc Mark Wielaard
2020-06-20 0:46 ` David Blaikie
2020-06-24 22:21 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-06-25 23:45 ` David Blaikie
2020-05-31 21:33 ` David Blaikie
2020-06-01 16:25 ` Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200603031040.GD29024@bubble.grove.modra.org \
--to=amodra@gmail.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=dblaikie@gmail.com \
--cc=elfutils-devel@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark@klomp.org \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).