From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85190395205C for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:23:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 85190395205C Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-396-dJ3oR7vdPyKV9Od1xTESqw-1; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:23:40 -0400 X-MC-Unique: dJ3oR7vdPyKV9Od1xTESqw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 813A4464 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-112-188.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.188]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6E4A5BAF8 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:23:35 +0200 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Ahmad Nouralizadeh via Gdb Subject: Re: GDB Frame Unwinding for Pure Assembly Code Message-ID: <20200623122335.GA4137402@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20200622213956.GA3486027@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20200623072654.GA3548953@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:23:43 -0000 On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:48:42 +0200, Ahmad Nouralizadeh via Gdb wrote: > Thanks for the answer! Could you tell me why is an inline unwinder used? No. That is already too much dependent on the build, you should have provided reproducibility instructions in the first place. But then also I do not want to invest more time into it as I am LLDB developer and not GDB developer. Jan