public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "André Pönitz" <apoenitz@t-online.de>
To: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Proposal to remove Python 2 support
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 19:50:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200916175037.GA1898@klara> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200916135312.GB3030@embecosm.com>

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:53:12PM +0100, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> * Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> [2020-09-16 06:00:13 -0700]:
> 
> > > That has no sense for me because Python 2 doesn't disappear from distros.
> > 
> > I don't know how long this is going to be True, but "distros" have
> > been shipping Python 3.x for quite a while now, so lack of Python 2
> > support wouldn't prevent you from building GDB with Python support
> > enabled.
> 
> But a user might potentially have a significant body of Python 2 code
> that they run through GDB, so it's not as simple as "just" building
> with Python 3 and off they go.
>
> I think once distros start to drop Python 2 then there's a really good
> argument that GDB should drop Python 2 also, but before then we need
> to go in with our eyes open, if the distros still ship Python 2 then
> users might be annoyed if they have to rewrite their scripts.

I am not sure whether this is significant, but I have a data point here:

I have ~13kLOC of Python code to be used with GDB that I currently need
to keep compatible with Python 2 and 3, as this may be used with any GDB.

Dropping Python 2 would certainly make /my/ life simpler.

Regards,
André

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-16 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-15 20:46 Tom Tromey
2020-09-15 20:58 ` Paul Koning
2020-09-15 22:54   ` Re[2]: " fedor_qd
2020-09-16 13:00     ` Joel Brobecker
2020-09-16 13:53       ` Andrew Burgess
2020-09-16 15:03         ` Paul Koning
2020-09-16 15:23         ` Joel Brobecker
2020-09-16 15:34           ` Andrew Burgess
2020-09-17 17:07             ` Tom Tromey
2020-09-17 17:49               ` Joel Brobecker
2020-09-17 18:03                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-09-17 18:10                   ` Jan Kratochvil
2020-09-17 18:45                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-09-18  7:15                       ` vincent Dupaquis
2020-09-18  7:25                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-09-17 18:16                   ` Joel Brobecker
2020-09-16 15:44           ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-09-16 17:50         ` André Pönitz [this message]
2020-09-17 17:03         ` Tom Tromey
2020-09-18 15:59 ` Pedro Alves
2020-09-18 16:39   ` Mikhail.Terekhov
2020-09-18 16:55     ` Tom Tromey
2020-09-18 17:13       ` Mikhail.Terekhov
2020-09-18 17:35         ` Pedro Alves
2020-09-18 19:20       ` Jeffrey Walton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200916175037.GA1898@klara \
    --to=apoenitz@t-online.de \
    --cc=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).