From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cgf.cx (external.cgf.cx [107.170.62.102]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E6EF3858C50; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 18:42:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8E6EF3858C50 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gcc.gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cgf.cx X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 cgf.cx F3C8B114104 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-CGF-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 spammy=Tokens not available. Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 14:42:33 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: Siddhesh Poyarekar Cc: Overseers mailing list , gdb@sourceware.org, Mark Wielaard , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: The GNU Toolchain Infrastructure Project Message-ID: <20221004184233.lcayg3huiqrpbkqd@cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Siddhesh Poyarekar , Overseers mailing list , gdb@sourceware.org, Mark Wielaard , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <6f6d141b-b776-8707-2c91-dc38d20aa9e1@gotplt.org> <20221004171007.oc2ot6eu6l24aipn@cgf.cx> <05b0f7fa-7077-5a8b-0c2f-dfb3068dd10f@gotplt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <05b0f7fa-7077-5a8b-0c2f-dfb3068dd10f@gotplt.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 List-Id: On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 01:17:14PM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: >On 2022-10-04 13:10, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 09:46:08AM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: >> > I made and shared this copy to dispel any further false speculation of >> > scope creep of the GTI proposal. >> >> Who is doing the false speculation? Do you have a mailing list link? >> It would be interesting to know who's got it wrong. > >Mark asked upthread if content on gnu.org is also going to be migrated over >based on sharing of meeting minutes on the gnu.org domain. I think you mean: >>On Sun Oct 2 20:47:49 GMT 2022, Mark Wielaard wrote: >This does raise the question if you are also proposing migrating >non-sourceware services for projects like the websites of various of >the GNU projects on www.gnu.org or the release archives at the GNU ftp >server (and mirrors) those projects use. Reading the meeting logs (I wasn't there and left this project shortly after the meeting) I don't see anything that directly answers Mark's question. So, to me, this seems like an innocent request for clarification rather than an attempt to push a false speculation. There's no need to go down this rabbit hole, though. Thanks for clarifying. cgf