From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cgf.cx (external.cgf.cx [107.170.62.102]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14DF5385AC1F; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 22:07:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 14DF5385AC1F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=sourceware.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cgf.cx X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 cgf.cx BE487E9D46 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-CGF-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 spammy=Tokens not available. Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 18:07:54 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: Carlos O'Donell , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, overseers@sourceware.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Toolchain Infrastructure project statement of support Message-ID: <20221023220754.jc26gvdzs4aqxolv@cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Alexandre Oliva , Carlos O'Donell , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, overseers@sourceware.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org References: <2513b668-9ebd-9e78-7263-dc24f4a9558a@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 List-Id: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 06:19:33PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >It doesn't smell good, however, that Sourceware has been prevented from presenting its own >expansion plans and proposals at the Cauldron. I wish it too gets a chance to extend their offer. >There's no basis for a rational decision in refusing to listen to alternatives; it comes across to >me as acknowledgment that a weaker proposal wishes to prevail by denying others any consideration. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^