From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lndn.lancelotsix.com (vps-42846194.vps.ovh.net [IPv6:2001:41d0:801:2000::2400]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 168553858C00 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 15:51:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 168553858C00 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=lancelotsix.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lancelotsix.com Received: from ubuntu.lan (cust120-dsl54.idnet.net [212.69.54.120]) by lndn.lancelotsix.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7836480E9E; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 15:51:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lancelotsix.com; s=2021; t=1674834667; bh=wB3slBNr5Uc7UYfYI00bGA6E/xDRUU07V+1QZyDZtio=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=a7U28TQFpduSZNGZGHwDIs29cGGcnSxnRjNmBMUBvR1ZoJ7t6xO9OYQKmcmjFoZmB nYD8oWTSmqpN5oGFJ7K49cxYNQ+Mws8mSzdznnwpcL+JW1BJ0rPrukDV6k5p3IqITb ZtJ4ltQMlDg7hCkIAtD2CboUiyX6LqzGeZq+N+hraPzPoHzSDyDokxpETHhgzLZfig Pjpr9GK6iO40UWyPJBV3XcD9Hxuac1hPX+Ese1nMLd6tL0b0bB1AgUxc+Ej0dO9upN Ck9CeeOKvkyKuY5X4vrx5FtjfSv7jh2b6kUUBfSfqiU8OTu+RjbHvTZ9QbkMIeEiqj HLZdnECre5ypQ== Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 15:50:16 +0000 From: Lancelot SIX To: Tom Tromey Cc: Mark Wielaard , Luis Machado , Simon Marchi , "gdb@sourceware.org" , John Baldwin Subject: Re: Any concrete plans after the GDB BoF? Message-ID: <20230127155016.zchm4tsawlkdfyne@ubuntu.lan> References: <83485199-965e-7ff5-1dc8-d027b74b56f7@arm.com> <20230101220250.GA11041@gnu.wildebeest.org> <87tu0lxgee.fsf@tromey.com> <87bkmtx83b.fsf@tromey.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87bkmtx83b.fsf@tromey.com> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.11 (lndn.lancelotsix.com [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 15:51:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 01:30:00PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > Mark> I use git-pw for that: > Mark> https://patchwork.readthedocs.io/projects/git-pw/ > > Tom> Just to be clear -- I think if people want to use git-pw, they should, > Tom> and shouldn't wait for some official blessing. > > I gave it a look today. There were 8 pages of patches, but nearly all > of them have been checked in. I went through and cleaned out a few > pages, but TBH this is pretty boring, not to mention error-prone. > > Tom Hi, I usually try to run a script doing this automatically. However, it can only detect when a checked-in patch exactly matches what have been sent to the ML. So the situations where we have "OK to merge with this detail fixed" will not be caught by the script. Also, I wish patchwork could automatically close a patches/series when a new revision is sent to the ML. This is another class of patches which remain on patchwork when they should probably not. I did try to close those manually in the past, but got overwhelmed, so I do not do that anymore. That being said, I still use git-pw to fetch and apply patch and series. This is really convenient when I am not working on the host where I have my mail client. Lancelot.