public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
To: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>,
	Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>,
	Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,
	Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>,
	"gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: The GNU Toolchain Infrastructure Project
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 14:45:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20e6f3c3-60e4-cf67-e228-aec7293e7c2c@gotplt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d4b9d7cb-b86a-862b-1db2-de70d2f46d0e@arm.com>

On 2022-10-17 08:16, Luis Machado wrote:
>>> Binutils is tightly coupled to GDB though (or the other way around). 
>>> I suppose both projects would
>>> need to seek agreement on this, otherwise they'd have to be split at 
>>> some point.
>>
>> I couldn't see any follow-up discussion on the gdb mailing list.  Have 
>> there been discussions elsewhere and is there a direction y'all have 
>> some consensus on?
>>
>> Sid
> 
> There have been none to my knowledge. And no consensus either.
> 

The FSF is hosting a call for this next week, so hopefully that'll help 
the gdb community start a discussion and come to some consensus:

https://sourceware.org/pipermail/overseers/2022q4/018997.html

Sid

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-18 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <b00dc0aa-31a6-a004-a430-099af3d0f6d1@redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <558996ac-e4a0-cf77-48b9-f7d0e13862e8@redhat.com>
2022-10-17 11:48   ` Luis Machado
2022-10-17 12:08     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-17 12:16       ` Luis Machado
2022-10-18 18:45         ` Siddhesh Poyarekar [this message]
     [not found] <d9cb6cf9-89f5-87bb-933b-a03240479e71@redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <a9396df3-5699-46ef-0b33-6c7589274654@redhat.com>
2022-10-02 20:47   ` Mark Wielaard
2022-10-04 13:46     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-04 14:01       ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-04 14:13         ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-04 14:19           ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-04 14:33             ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-04 14:41               ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-04 14:55                 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-04 15:07                   ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-06 21:42             ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-10-04 17:10       ` Christopher Faylor
2022-10-04 17:17         ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-04 18:42           ` Christopher Faylor
2022-10-04 19:05           ` Mark Wielaard
2022-10-04 19:10             ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-06 20:02               ` Mark Wielaard
2022-10-06 20:12                 ` Christopher Faylor
2022-10-06 21:37                   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-07 13:39                     ` Mark Wielaard
2022-10-06 21:07                 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-06 21:36                   ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-06 21:44                     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-06 22:57                       ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-11 13:02                         ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-07  8:57                   ` Mark Wielaard
2022-10-11 13:24                     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-11 14:23                       ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-11 15:58                     ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-10-11 17:14                       ` David Edelsohn
2022-10-11 18:12                         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-12  8:00                         ` Mark Wielaard
2022-10-12 13:18                           ` Florian Weimer
2022-10-12 21:23                             ` Mark Wielaard
2022-10-12 15:15                           ` Jonathan Corbet
2022-10-12 10:55                         ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-09-27 20:08 Carlos O'Donell
2022-09-28 22:38 ` Carlos O'Donell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20e6f3c3-60e4-cf67-e228-aec7293e7c2c@gotplt.org \
    --to=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
    --cc=nickc@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).