From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (gnu.wildebeest.org [45.83.234.184]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CBBB385AC29; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 11:57:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 5CBBB385AC29 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org Received: from tarox.wildebeest.org (83-87-18-245.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.87.18.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 510D7300B36D; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 13:57:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tarox.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0BAF24001689; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 13:57:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <218a042d9f4f252213b2378a5aafc51c018c7866.camel@klomp.org> Subject: Re: buildbot vs --enable-targets=all From: Mark Wielaard To: Luis Machado , noloader@gmail.com Cc: Gdb , Binutils Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 13:57:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <94d446556e470859b878bb27eec5e2a52d063673.camel@klomp.org> <62a77a3a304f0088fe75adfb2b2ce3339023a32a.camel@klomp.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-10.el7) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 11:57:09 -0000 Hi Luis, On Wed, 2022-08-03 at 12:54 +0100, Luis Machado wrote: > Ah, I see. And s390/ppc being potentially big endian, this fails. >=20 > I managed to reproduce this on my end by forcing GDB to use big > endian. Could you please file a PR for this one and cc me? >=20 > I'll try to come up with a fix. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29432 Thanks, Mark