public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Ingham <jingham@apple.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Gdb] removing src/dejagnu, src/expect
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 17:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <37C73752-B972-11D8-AEAF-000A958F4C44@apple.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1086697608.21986.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>

The gcc QA folks here apparently already use the built-in version of 
expect, not the src/ one for their automated testsuite runs.  They said 
they had to fix one 3.3 test, but that test is okay in 3.5.  So it 
sounds like we are okay.

The bit of info that needs to be transferred, then, is that whoever 
does the work to incorporate whatever patches we have to the expect 
sources shouldn't bother to try to get Ian's patches in, as they aren't 
really needed.

Jim

On Jun 8, 2004, at 5:26 AM, gdb-digest-help@sources.redhat.com wrote:

>
> Jim Ingham writes:
>> I just reran the gdb testsuite - on the Apple gdb but this shouldn't
>> make much difference - with the Expect 5.38 from the SourceForge
>> sources, and with Tcl 8.4.4, also from SourceForge, and I didn't see
>> any new failures compared with the expect & tcl from src/.
>
> I've done a similar comparison with the gdb testsuite on native
> i686-pc-linux-gnu, (red hat 8.0, LANG=en_US.UTF-8), and the results
> came out the same.  I've been using the released versions of
> tcl+expect+dejagnu for 2.5 years now.
>
> That's just gdb experience though.
>
> I'm okay with shooting first and fixing problems later.
>
> Michael C
>

       reply	other threads:[~2004-06-08 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1086697608.21986.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2004-06-08 17:35 ` Jim Ingham [this message]
2004-06-09  2:24 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-08 21:29 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-06-09  0:54 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-06-07 21:58 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-06-08 20:57 ` Christopher Faylor
     [not found] <1086598259.8126.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2004-06-07 21:37 ` Jim Ingham
     [not found] <20040605143942.E37E74B104@berman.michael-chastain.com>
2004-06-05 16:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=37C73752-B972-11D8-AEAF-000A958F4C44@apple.com \
    --to=jingham@apple.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).