From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-47106-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 124644 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2019 20:00:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 124633 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jul 2019 20:00:45 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=cdt, suppressing, CDT
X-HELO: mail-wm1-f41.google.com
Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com (HELO mail-wm1-f41.google.com) (209.85.128.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 20:00:44 +0000
Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id z23so10759499wma.4        for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 13:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <palves@redhat.com>
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f913:f700:4c97:6d52:2cea:997b? ([2001:8a0:f913:f700:4c97:6d52:2cea:997b])        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f17sm3970934wmf.27.2019.07.05.13.00.41        (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);        Fri, 05 Jul 2019 13:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: MI3 and async notifications
To: Jonah Graham <jonah@kichwacoders.com>, Jan Vrany <jan.vrany@fit.cvut.cz>
References: <70fdd9107d9bb3cee0a1a342aedc05bf3c8e9bae.camel@fit.cvut.cz> <CAPmGMvjDKHQPH7y3aYC-v3C75D8rO42FhWf_MsFK7p49aGZQpQ@mail.gmail.com> <6d00108e3693957c4d2e648bae64cb9f4fce63bd.camel@fit.cvut.cz> <CAPmGMvhcGDD=WbY06JTwESugwifBeR_p2eBnRyToR-FW9VKoYw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <388ffb33-bb44-b997-fcda-b9585d51e360@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2019 20:00:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPmGMvhcGDD=WbY06JTwESugwifBeR_p2eBnRyToR-FW9VKoYw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2019-07/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2

On 6/11/19 2:37 PM, Jonah Graham wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 04:50, Jan Vrany <jan.vrany@fit.cvut.cz> wrote:
> 
>> As you can see, you get the notification *before* ^done response. Does
>> that answer
>> your questions?
>>
>>
> Yes that does. I think CDT will use the mi-always-notify option.

Funny.  ISTR that the breakpoint notification suppressing was
originally done for CDT and reading/hearing Vladimir argue for
it.  :-D  Though I can't find any arguing about that aspect
around the original patch now:

 https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-04/msg00471.html

Vladimir said "As other MI notifications", but I checked out
the tree for that commit (8d3788bd590a), and I couldn't find
any other suppression that existed back then.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves