From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Add review tags to patch review workflow.
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 14:34:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3991d701-3de6-c227-7f34-4bfc74b8d6f0@palves.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c95e1f9-db82-a60e-7d4d-21eaea4435db@redhat.com>
Hi!
On 2022-10-10 10:27 a.m., Bruno Larsen via Gdb wrote:
> 1. If you have the authority to approve a patch and believe the patch
> you are reviewing is ready to be merged, add the following line to your
> e-mail (usually at the end): Approved-by: Your Name
> <your_email@example.com>
>
> 2. If you don't have the authority to approve patches, or aren't
> convinced that you know enough about the area of code to fully approve a
> patch for merging, and haven't found any technical issues (i.e.
> non-nitpicks) with the patch, add the following line to your e-mail:
> Reviewed-by: Your Name <your_email@example.com>
>
> 3. If you aren't sure of the quality of the technical changes, but you
> have tested and verified that the patch does not add any regressions,
> add the following line to your e-mail: Tested-by: Your Name
> <your_name@example.com>
(Should not be a surprise since I said as much at the Cauldron, but,)
FAOD, I'm for giving this a try.
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-10 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-21 11:04 Bruno Larsen
2022-09-25 22:38 ` Lancelot SIX
2022-09-26 13:55 ` Simon Marchi
2022-09-26 16:42 ` Joel Brobecker
2022-09-27 8:39 ` Luis Machado
2022-09-27 8:42 ` Luis Machado
2022-09-27 9:38 ` Lancelot SIX
2022-09-27 21:07 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2022-09-26 21:32 ` John Baldwin
2022-09-27 8:06 ` Bruno Larsen
2022-09-27 12:02 ` Simon Marchi
2022-09-27 12:03 ` Bruno Larsen
2022-09-27 17:11 ` John Baldwin
2022-09-27 7:58 ` Bruno Larsen
2022-09-27 12:03 ` Simon Marchi
2022-09-26 15:59 ` Luis Machado
2022-09-26 16:32 ` Elena Zannoni
2022-09-27 8:30 ` Bruno Larsen
2022-09-27 20:50 ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-10-07 7:49 ` Bruno Larsen
2022-10-07 20:46 ` Simon Marchi
2022-10-08 6:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-10-08 11:55 ` Simon Marchi
2022-10-08 12:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-10-09 0:29 ` Simon Marchi
2022-10-10 9:27 ` Bruno Larsen
2022-10-10 9:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-10-10 10:11 ` Bruno Larsen
2022-10-10 11:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-10-10 12:31 ` Bruno Larsen
2022-10-10 13:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-10-10 13:26 ` Bruno Larsen
2022-10-10 15:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-10-10 13:34 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2022-10-10 9:39 ` Luis Machado
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3991d701-3de6-c227-7f34-4bfc74b8d6f0@palves.net \
--to=pedro@palves.net \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).