From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>, drow@mvista.com
Cc: stcarrez@nerim.fr, brobecker@gnat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com,
kettenis@chello.nl
Subject: Re: 8-byte register values on a 32-bit machine
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E6F53B3.6010803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200303021659.h22Gxc908446@duracef.shout.net>
> Okay, I got some sleep and drank some tea and stuff. I'm a bit more
> calm now. :)
>
> I filed a proper PR, so that Daniel J (or anybody) can flow it into
> their TODO list. Daniel said he has several things to do in this code
> so I want to get in line properly.
>
> I did mark it severity=critical because gdb prints incorrect values, and
> priority=high because Stephane C says that it happens a lot on the HC11.
>
> gdb 5.3 has a different bug in the same area, so this is only sort-of a
> regression. The specific program store.exp in the test suite regressed
> between 2003-02-15 and 2003-02-23, but my test program r8.c in the PR is
> busted with both gdb 5.3 and gdb 2003-03-01-cvs.
Shouldn't the new code have been made conditional until it at least
equalled the functionality of the old mechanism?
By failing to do this to do this, the next release of GDB has gained a
dependency on the timetable of an internal change. That is bad.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-12 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-02 16:59 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-03-12 15:35 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-03-12 15:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-12 16:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-12 17:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-12 18:15 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-12 18:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-12 18:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-12 18:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-12 18:48 ` Paul Koning
2003-03-12 19:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-12 21:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-12 20:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-14 16:27 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-03-13 4:18 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-03-13 17:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-12 19:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-03-12 20:47 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-02 6:52 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-03-02 9:35 ` Stephane Carrez
2003-03-03 4:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-01 20:57 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-03-01 22:46 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-02-24 2:36 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-03-01 13:35 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-03-01 20:33 ` Joel Brobecker
2003-03-01 22:38 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-03-01 23:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-02 0:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-03 11:26 ` Richard Earnshaw
2003-03-03 11:52 ` Keith Walker
2003-03-01 23:39 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E6F53B3.6010803@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@gnat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kettenis@chello.nl \
--cc=mec@shout.net \
--cc=stcarrez@nerim.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).