From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20276 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2003 17:05:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20215 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2003 17:05:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2003 17:05:41 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3FF2B11; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:05:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E70BA5B.3040302@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:05:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: brobecker@gnat.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, kettenis@chello.nl, stcarrez@nerim.fr Subject: Re: 8-byte register values on a 32-bit machine References: <200303130418.h2D4IdH22313@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00208.txt.bz2 > mec> The general case of 2-word structures in 5.3 was broken. That is to say, > mec> my simple test program (attached to the PR) fails with both 5.3 and HEAD. > > ac> I386 or general? To the best of my knowledge, structs worked on > ac> non-i386 architectures. > > Native i686-pc-linux-gnu. Right, so it can't be assumed that `the general case of 2-word structs in 5.3 was broken'. > I just tested on native sparc-sun-solaris2.7, but the only compiler > I have, gcc 3.2.2, does not put the 2-word structure into registers. Thanks for clarifying this, Andrew