From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19282 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2003 21:26:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19253 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2003 21:26:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 21:26:53 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578122B11 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:26:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E7F7817.5040700@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 21:26:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Obsolete SPARClet, SPARClite Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00334.txt.bz2 Hello, GDB currently includes support for two non-multi-arch SPARC specific variants: *** Changes in GDB-4.7: 1992 Fujitsu SPARClite sparclite-fujitsu-none or sparclite *** Changes in GDB-4.17: 1998 Tsqware Sparclet sparclet-*-* I'd like to obsolete both of them. It will help clear the way for a more complete overhaul of the SPARC target (but don't assume I'm doing that :-). The alternative is to try and find someone that is interested in multi-arching them. Given their age, I've given up holding my breath ... Andrew