From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20739 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2003 06:11:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20732 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2003 06:11:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.166.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Mar 2003 06:11:31 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D812B23; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 01:11:20 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E87DC08.6070205@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 06:11:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb.base/scope.exp problems and possible fix References: <20030325162929.GG23762@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20030325163931.GB16179@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00411.txt.bz2 Jim, > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:29:29PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> But is that workaround a valid fix? > > > I don't think it's completely right, but I have good news for you - I > do have a patch that I think _is_ right. I submitted it for review two > weeks ago. Would you please try the patch in: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-03/msg00286.html > and tell me whether it works as well for you? Can you please look at this. It's been identified as a serious problem: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-03/msg00193.html Andrew