Re: gdb.mi/mi-cli.exp failures

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>]

> On what target - I don't see these...

RH 7.2 i386, PPC and d10v also show a jump in failures but I've not 
checked that they are 100% identical.

> This looks like a crash in the same function that changed interface...
> perhaps the memory leak fix for simple.c was wrong, although I can't

Applying the simple.c change causes the problem.

Index: simple.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/simple.c,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- simple.c    30 Nov 2002 08:39:40 -0000      1.5
+++ simple.c    31 Mar 2003 18:13:25 -0000      1.6
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
  /* simple.c -- BFD simple client routines
-   Copyright 2002
+   Copyright 2002, 2003
     Free Software Foundation, Inc.
     Contributed by MontaVista Software, Inc.

@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@
    struct bfd_link_order link_order;
    struct bfd_link_callbacks callbacks;
    bfd_byte *contents, *data;
-  int storage_needed, number_of_symbols;
+  int storage_needed;
    asymbol **symbol_table;

    if (! (sec->flags & SEC_RELOC))
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@

    storage_needed = bfd_get_symtab_upper_bound (abfd);
    symbol_table = (asymbol **) bfd_malloc (storage_needed);
-  number_of_symbols = bfd_canonicalize_symtab (abfd, symbol_table);
+  bfd_canonicalize_symtab (abfd, symbol_table);

    contents = bfd_get_relocated_section_contents (abfd,
                                                  &link_info,
@@ -208,5 +208,6 @@

    bfd_link_hash_table_free (abfd, link_info.hash);

+  free (symbol_table);
    return contents;
  }

A guess is that something still has a reference to the symbab.

> quite see why.  By the way, adding or removing the NULL at the end is
> all that GDB needs to do to work with both interfaces.

Doesn't work.  To test my patches, I've had to adjust upwards the 
expected failure list.

Andrew