From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30267 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2003 17:38:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30234 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2003 17:38:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Apr 2003 17:38:46 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7C32B2F; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:38:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3E9D9523.2070407@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 17:38:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Taylor Cc: Daniel Berlin , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: stabs and macro information References: <159A1846-702B-11D7-83B7-000393575BCC@dberlin.org> <200304161716.h3GHGLN00754@mailhub.lss.emc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00168.txt.bz2 > Not yet. The copyright assignment paperwork for EMC's changes to GCC > hasn't been approved/signed yet by management. I expect it will be > approved/signed, but it hasn't been yet. > > [I feel that it is inappropriate to post changes if they are not > assigned (unless they are small enough to not need an assignment). This is really appreciated. > However, I do feel it is appropriate to discuss how to do it / what to > name things / etc. as the changes are likely to be assigned.] Yes. Technical aspects should be fleshed out up front. That way all parties concerned know what has been agreed to. Just leaves the small issue of implementation :-) Andrew