From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25980 invoked by alias); 14 May 2003 16:02:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25908 invoked from network); 14 May 2003 16:02:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.166.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 May 2003 16:02:41 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A9A2B2F; Wed, 14 May 2003 12:02:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3EC26895.4090407@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 16:02:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: troth@verinet.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: breakpoint for avr? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00225.txt.bz2 Theodore, Just noticed that the AVR target doesn't provide the BREAKPOINT_FROM_PC method. Up until now the architecture vector providing a default breakpoint_from_pc (it would internal error for the AVR case). I suspect, up until now, this hasn't been a problem because the AVR was always remote. Anyway, I've just posted a patch to always require breakpoint-from-pc and this is causing the AVR grief. So, is there a breakpoint instruction, or should GDB allow targets that have no breakpoint at all? enjoy, Andrew