From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-14021-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 3500 invoked by alias); 29 May 2003 20:41:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 3464 invoked from network); 29 May 2003 20:41:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO stardust.solidas.com) (217.13.28.68)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 May 2003 20:41:44 -0000
Received: from solidas.com (217-13-28-83.dd.nextgentel.com [217.13.28.83])
	(authenticated)
	by stardust.solidas.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4TKfal02338;
	Thu, 29 May 2003 22:41:36 +0200
Message-ID: <3ED67092.30805@solidas.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 20:41:00 -0000
From: "Svein E. Seldal" <Svein.Seldal@solidas.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030521 Debian/1.3.1-1
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: FP aliases
References: <3ED54A80.3030900@solidas.com> <3ED63129.9020500@redhat.com> <3ED6644D.2030201@solidas.com> <3ED66705.3080100@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <3ED66705.3080100@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00404.txt.bz2

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> What of -fomit-frame-pointer?  GDB's past mistake was to assume, as your 
> suggesting, that $fp is always a hard register.  Unfortunatly, GCC 
> eventually got better ideas (and eliminated that assumption) causing GDB 
> to fall apart.

Now I suddenly realize why gdb isn't sticking around with the FP methods!

Thanks,
Svein