From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26463 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2003 13:55:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26446 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2003 13:55:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dymwsm08.mailwatch.com) (204.253.83.44) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Jun 2003 13:55:41 -0000 Received: from mwsc0232.mw4.mailwatch.com (mwsc0232.mw4.mailwatch.com [204.253.83.63]) by dymwsm08.mailwatch.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h54Dteo7005491; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:55:40 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by mwsc0232.mw4.mailwatch.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:55:40 -0400 Received: from 204.253.83.144 ([204.253.83.144]) by MWSC0232 with SMTP id 00020020b12673c3-a191-4461-b5d9-2cb5c7a3fed0; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 09:55:40 -0500 Received: from ecpo1.azell.com (ecpo1.azell.com [136.1.7.4]) by dymwsm04.mailwatch.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h54Dsc4C008854; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:55:39 -0400 Received: from pms536.pd9.ford.com ([19.88.68.21]) by ecpo1.azell.com (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.5-GR) with ESMTP id AVL21676; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:39:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ford.com by pms536.pd9.ford.com (8.8.8+Sun/Ford-1.12) via ESMTP id JAA20878; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:38:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3EDDF660.1090200@ford.com> Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 13:55:00 -0000 From: Kelley Cook User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com CC: "Eli Zaretskii" Subject: <20030603193258.GA32189@doctormoo> <7458-Wed04Jun2003062758+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MW-BTID: 090525000020031555013900001 X-MW-CTIME: 1054734939 HOP-COUNT: 1 X-MAILWATCH-INSTANCEID: 01020020b12673c3-a191-4461-b5d9-2cb5c7a3fed0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jun 2003 13:55:40.0543 (UTC) FILETIME=[FBE070F0:01C32AA0] X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 >> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:32:58 -0400 >> From: Nathanael Nerode >> >> I'm opposed to the GFDL, particularly with "Invariant Sections" > > Can you tell why? Please do not continue this subthread on the gdb, gcc, or binutils lists as is it is not on-topic. A lively discussion on this topic which does include RMS, has been going on the Debian-Legal ListServ (http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/) for months now. Feel free to peruse their mail archive or Google for "Debian GFDL" for details on the debate. I am speaking purely an outsider. If anyone thinks that I shouldn't have said this, please email me directly. Kelley Cook