From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10890 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2003 13:52:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10820 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2003 13:52:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dymwsm17.mailwatch.com) (204.253.83.165) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Jun 2003 13:52:01 -0000 Received: from mwsc0231.mw4.mailwatch.com (mwsc0231.mw4.mailwatch.com [204.253.83.45]) by dymwsm17.mailwatch.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h54Dq0NL023348; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:52:00 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by mwsc0231.mw4.mailwatch.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:52:00 -0400 Received: from 204.253.83.39 ([204.253.83.39]) by MWSC0231 with SMTP id 0002001fdda1bd2e-b54b-4af5-a84b-5285243e8f57; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 09:52:00 -0500 Received: from ecpo1.azell.com (ecpo1.azell.com [136.1.7.4]) by dymwsm15.mailwatch.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h54DmvTa020821; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:49:50 -0400 Received: from pms536.pd9.ford.com ([19.88.68.21]) by ecpo1.azell.com (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.5-GR) with ESMTP id AVL23331; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:43:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ford.com by pms536.pd9.ford.com (8.8.8+Sun/Ford-1.12) via ESMTP id JAA22701; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:43:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3EDDF784.5020908@ford.com> Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 13:52:00 -0000 From: Kelley Cook User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Libiberty licensing problems & solutions [DRAFT] References: <20030603193258.GA32189@doctormoo> <7458-Wed04Jun2003062758+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> <3EDDF660.1090200@ford.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MW-BTID: 090425000020031554979000002 X-MW-CTIME: 1054734590 HOP-COUNT: 1 X-MAILWATCH-INSTANCEID: 0102001fdda1bd2e-b54b-4af5-a84b-5285243e8f57 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jun 2003 13:52:00.0890 (UTC) FILETIME=[78F40DA0:01C32AA0] X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2 >> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:32:58 -0400 >> From: Nathanael Nerode >> >> I'm opposed to the GFDL, particularly with "Invariant Sections" > > Can you tell why? Please do not continue this subthread on the gdb, gcc, or binutils lists as is it is not on-topic. A lively discussion on this topic which does include RMS, has been going on the Debian-Legal ListServ (http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/) for months now. Feel free to peruse their mail archive or Google for "Debian GFDL" for details on the debate. I am speaking purely an outsider. If anyone thinks that I shouldn't have said this, please email me directly. Kelley Cook BTW, Sorry about the duplicate message.