From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20378 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2003 15:48:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20348 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2003 15:48:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.131) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Jun 2003 15:48:05 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657872B2F; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:47:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3EDE14AB.8050803@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 15:48:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Edwards Cc: Raja Saleru , Gdb Subject: Re: GDB Server - remote serial protocol References: <20030604091904.A26714@visi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 > On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 11:34:29AM +0900, Raja Saleru wrote: > > Dude, fix the date on your system. It's 2003. At least in > this part of the world.... > > >> while remote debugging the application using gdb and gdbserver, >> the user at host side can use the remote protocol commands only >> ? or standard gdb commands ? or both ? > > > The user uses standard gdb commands. The remote protocol is > strictly an internal thing that the two gdbs use to talk to > each other. BTW, it's possible to send the remote end arbitrary requests using: (gdb) monitor .... The effect, and even the level of support, is entirely dependant on the remote stub. Mutter something about security. Andrew