From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24046 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2003 19:47:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24014 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2003 19:47:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.131) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2003 19:47:03 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384C32B2F; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:46:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3EDF9E31.2010609@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 19:47:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Theodore A. Roth" Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: return_pc in d10v_unwind_cache References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 > Hi, > > I was digging through the d10v searching for wisdom and noticed that > the return_pc field of struct d10v_unwind_cache is set in > d10v_frame_unwind_cache() but the value is never used anywhere. Is > this just a leftover from the removal of d10v_pop_frame() or is there > some use for the return pc I'm missing? It's a left over from the removal of d10v_pop_frame and d10v_frame_saved_pc. I'd better delete it. Andrew