From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24055 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2003 17:40:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23542 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2003 17:40:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.131) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jun 2003 17:40:37 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B44F2B63; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:40:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3EE61810.3000700@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 17:40:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Mitchell Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" , Zack Weinberg , Joe Buck , DJ Delorie , aoliva@redhat.com, cgf@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Updating to Autoconf 2.5x References: <87of17t2j4.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <3EE4F6AD.7060300@redhat.com> <20030609210940.GA15597@redhat.com> <20030609163836.A20345@synopsys.com> <200306092345.h59Nj3Tf021127@envy.delorie.com> <20030609173251.A20668@synopsys.com> <873ciitunz.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <1055227336.9370.14.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> <1055260613.9414.38.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00167.txt.bz2 > On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 02:25, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > >> On Tue, 9 Jun 2003, Mark Mitchell wrote: >> > >> > [However, I do think it's odd that the FSF worked so hard to get GCC to >> > come from gcc.gnu.org, but binutils and lots of other GNU stuff still >> > comes from sources.redhat.com.] > >> >> But the binutils@gcc.gnu.org alias for the list was set up on 18 Jun 2001 >> in response to a request from RMS. (I don't know about GDB, or about the >> FSF position on which domain name is used in documentation. overseers >> likewise has a list alias @gcc.gnu.org.) > > > That's all well and good, but the basic point certainly remains: we've > worked very hard to make GCC appear to come entirely from a machine > named gcc.gnu.org, and similar work has not been done for GDB, binutils, > glibc, etc. Red Hat domain names and logos appear frequently on those > web pages. Again, for the record. http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/ et.al., is used where possible through out GDB's documentation. It doesn't work when it comes to mainling lists and CVS, but then, as I've already pointed out, requests for gdb.gnu.org have been declined. Andrew