From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31253 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2003 21:01:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26712 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2003 20:59:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.drexel.edu) (144.118.25.40) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Jun 2003 20:59:58 -0000 Received: from webmail.drexel.edu (webmail.drexel.edu [144.118.25.20]) by mail.drexel.edu (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.2001.07.26.11.50.p9) with ESMTP id <0HGD00AENZNVMQ@mail.drexel.edu> for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 16:59:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 21:01:00 -0000 From: nak26 Subject: RE: examining remote core dumps; MT support for attach; To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: drow , gdb Message-id: <3EE917EC@webmail.drexel.edu> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-WebMail-UserID: nak26 X-EXP32-SerialNo: 00003005 X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00222.txt.bz2 >>> 1. Is it possible to examine a core file on a remote machine, in the cases, >> where fetching the core is undesirable due to the thinness of the pipe. > >This is not supported. How hard would it be to add support for that? I can give it a try, but would need some guidance... >> 2. Does the gdbserver that comes with gdb5.3 work with multithreaded apps, or >> it needs to be additionally patched? > >It should work. I saw a PREPARE_TO_PROCEED patch beeing mentioned in some of the posts. In which cases it heeds to be applied? Thanks, --Nik