From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17682 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2003 16:30:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17664 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2003 16:30:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.166.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2003 16:30:44 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8EB12B5F; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 12:30:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3EEB4DB2.30403@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 16:30:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz , "Alfred M. Szmidt" Cc: Jeroen Dekkers , gdb@sources.redhat.com, kettenis@gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix GNU/Hurd build error References: <20030529131545.GA458@pc-jeroen> <20030614161900.GA6388@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00282.txt.bz2 > On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 06:01:51PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > >> This is the second time I have pinged about this patch (last ping was >> on June 10th, the actual patch was sent on May 29th). Does anyone in >> GDB world actualy care about GNU? Because it sure doesn't look like >> it; two weeks for an obvious fix is not acceptable... > No, judging from the response apparently no one in the GDB world cares > about GNU. GDB's response time to patches is slow; live with it > instead of placing demands upon volunteers. It was sitting in a catch-all queue that gets drained before each new release so was not ``lost''. > The patch looks reasonable, so I have checked it in. Thanks, I'll delete it. Andrew