From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25741 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2003 13:48:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25497 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 13:48:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.131) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 13:48:25 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394C52B5F; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:48:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3EEDCAA1.8010801@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:48:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Jaeger Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 6 branch, 21st June? References: <3EEA6240.4070401@redhat.com> <3EEDBA78.2030609@redhat.com> <20030616125110.GB16251@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00315.txt.bz2 > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: >>> Pretty much on par. break main, run, next definitly works. > >> >> i386-linux is down at around ten failures. Alpha's a bit higher, > Ten failures sounds fine! > > >> sparc's really rotten (thousands). IRIX and HP/UX are also several hundred but they sort of work. So 100's about par. > I hope that even if we branch on the 21st, we have the possibility to > get fixes for those failures on x86_64 into the branch? Unfortunatly > Michal is on vacation until the 28th and cannot do anything himself - > and I'm also occupied :-( See: 15.2 Branch Commit Policy http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdbint_15.html#SEC132 it's probably ok. Andrew