From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Moving gcc/intl to toplevel; syncing both copies to 0.12.1
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 16:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F045338.90803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <873choyfse.fsf@codesourcery.com>
> Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> writes:
>
>
>>> I'd like to do this today, and commit to both gcc and src CVS
>>> as soon as I've tested it; it is blocking another major change
>>> over in gcc land, which needs to happen this week. Will this be
>>> okay? Does anyone know a reason why upgrading to 0.12.1 is a bad idea?
>
>>
>> Can you two stage this - import into GCC, and then a week or so later,
>> import in to SRC? That way the group with the most to gain (and
>> apparently the greatest urgency) experience the most pain :-)
>
>
> I could do that;
Thanks! How does this stand with binutils?
Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-03 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-02 17:07 Zack Weinberg
2003-07-02 17:49 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-02 17:56 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-07-02 17:59 ` Phil Edwards
2003-07-03 16:01 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F045338.90803@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=zack@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).