public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Robert Vazan <robertvazan@privateweb.sk>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Terminally slow (75 seconds) on some steps
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 16:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F16D022.30209@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Mahogany-0.65.0-16720-20030712-110333.00@pcw2k69.energoinfo.sk>

> I am trying to debug large program and I am observing unusual slowdown.
> I don't have any breakpoints, I am just running the app. I measured 75
> seconds of wall clock for single click operation that takes fraction of
> second outside debugger. Process time (as viewed by ps) of gdb increased
> by 68 seconds. I get realtime reaction with some operations and this
> delay with some other operations. When single stepping, it seems that
> the more lines must be executed the more time it takes in debugger (but
> this is in 1-5 seconds range).
> 
> As if gdb was emulating every instruction. I know this isn't the case.
> However, breakpoints cause interrupts, so maybe gdb is being bogged down
> by some other interrupts, timer maybe? Given that single step can take
> one or more seconds, few timers could quickly accumulate to minute.
> 
> I have also this problem that I cannot run the program twice per
> session, so I have to restart gdb and consequently reload symbols. I
> have aging snapshot from 1. April 2002.

Is this a threaded program on GNU/Linux?  5.3 contained a major 
performance improvement for threaded debugging.

Also, something from April '02 is seriously old.  Try either 5.3, or a 
6.0 snap (see http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/download/)


  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-17 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1057999221.6815.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
2003-07-12  9:03 ` Robert Vazan
2003-07-17 16:34   ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-07-18 13:06     ` Robert Vazan
2003-07-18 21:56       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-19 11:29         ` Robert Vazan
2003-07-21 14:21           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-21 17:38             ` Robert Vazan
2003-08-05  5:20               ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-05 18:04                 ` Robert Vazan
2003-08-05 18:35                   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-14 12:05                     ` Robert Vazan
2003-08-15 22:59                       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-16 15:11                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-16 16:36                           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-16 16:41                             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-17  3:29                               ` Daniel Berlin
2003-08-18 15:05                                 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-18 16:15                                   ` Daniel Berlin
2003-08-16 16:38                         ` Robert Vazan
2003-08-20 16:12                         ` Robert Vazan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F16D022.30209@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=robertvazan@privateweb.sk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).