From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8594 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2003 15:53:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8587 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2003 15:53:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2003 15:53:23 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C6B2B7F for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:53:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F40F66E.1080508@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:53:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: 6.0 issues Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00195.txt.bz2 Off the top of my head: - the gdb.cp re-vamp scheduled for near the end of this week - red zone re-fix And I guess: - something about GDB vs GCC over unknown CFI register values New features shouldn't be going into the 6.0 branch (although there is an extreem tollerance towards targets getting their frame code rewritten :-). Andrew