From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29267 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2003 17:26:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29250 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2003 17:26:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2003 17:26:47 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F4C2B7F; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:26:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F410C51.3000102@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 17:26:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: 6.0 issues References: <200308181716.h7IHG1IY003490@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00201.txt.bz2 > Andrew C says: > - the gdb.cp re-vamp scheduled for near the end of this week > > Okay, you and david c both want to do this in the branch, so I will > prepare to do it in the branch. But I might not make it in time. First > I am waiting a few more days for comment, then I do it in HEAD, then I > wait some more time to see if problems come up. > > It's fine with me if this misses the release -- I assume it's > okay with you? It can wait. Having it done will be easier in the long run. Andrew >> New features shouldn't be going into the 6.0 branch (although there is >> an extreem tollerance towards targets getting their frame code rewritten >> :-). > > > In this category I would like to add: Mark K's fix for gdb/1338, > "can't backtrace through select". > > Michael C >