From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: Two small remote protocol extensions
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 23:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F567C28.1040906@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030629021605.GA18990@nevyn.them.org>
> et cetera?
>
> Maybe allow:
> HtTID,TID,TIDs;0c
I don't think this case can arise. Well at least not immediatly. A
`hey we're thinking in this direction' comment wouldn't hurt though.
> [Is 0 a valid TID?]
GDB doesn't think it is (which can give targets grief :-/). However, it
could be a [sc] without the "0".
> Could we deprecate Hg/Hc in favor of this, to avoid specifying all the
> interactions?
>
> And is there any hope of fixing this in 6.0? :(((
Maybe 6.0.1.
Hmm, why are we even fighting with the H packet? The senario is GDB
telling the target to resume in more weird and more wonderful ways.
- single step a thread
- continue a thread
- step out of range a thread
- signal a thread
- continue or freeze remaining threads
can GDB simply grab a new letter and spec out it's real intent?
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-03 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-01 19:25 Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-02 8:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-02 8:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-02 9:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-02 12:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-02 12:22 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-05-02 12:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-02 13:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-02 14:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-03 11:24 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-03 14:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-03 15:18 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-03 15:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-04 19:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-02 13:13 ` Quality Quorum
2002-05-02 14:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-03 13:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-16 7:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-16 7:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-16 7:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-16 8:21 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-22 19:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-22 19:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-23 7:24 ` Quality Quorum
2002-08-23 7:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-23 7:49 ` Quality Quorum
2002-08-23 8:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-23 11:16 ` Quality Quorum
2002-08-23 12:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-23 13:10 ` Quality Quorum
2002-08-27 20:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-28 8:31 ` Quality Quorum
2002-08-28 9:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-28 9:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-22 21:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-23 5:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-23 12:10 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-23 12:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-23 13:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-27 21:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-28 6:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-25 8:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-25 11:17 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-26 18:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-26 18:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-29 7:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-03 23:41 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-09-17 15:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-17 16:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-17 16:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-22 0:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-22 1:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-22 3:02 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F567C28.1040906@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).