From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Stan Shebs <shebs@apple.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Features vs infrastructure (was Re: Tracepoint support in Cygnus GDB ?)
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 03:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F7B9B85.50201@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F7B4BEC.1060800@apple.com>
> Heh, I've been trolled! :-) I must say, I've been a little envious
> watching GDB development over the past couple of years; Cygnus was never
> able to afford so many cycles spent on internals. For multi-arch alone
> it took over three years from initial proposal to the actual hacking...
Interesting view of history.
> I just thumbed through the GDB website and sources, and gdb/TODO seemed
> like it was mostly a list of desired infrastructure changes. For instance,
> I didn't see a mention of the desirability of tracepoint support for native
> debugging, although that is an obvious item for a wishlist. Perhaps the
> todo list should be separated into "user-visible" and "infrastructure"
> sections, with appropriate xrefs, so that everybody is aware of what's
> desired.
GDB tracks new features using the bug database. I see one tracepoint
change which is me pointing out that an architecture method is broken.
Must remember to delete the TODO file.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-02 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-24 10:40 Tracepoint support in Cygnus GDB ? Saravanan
2003-09-24 18:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-09-24 22:41 ` Jim Blandy
2003-09-25 4:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-25 21:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-27 15:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-09-27 17:49 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-27 18:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-09-27 18:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-28 8:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-09-28 19:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-28 21:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-09-28 21:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-29 5:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-09-29 14:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-28 22:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-29 5:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-09-29 14:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-29 15:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-01 21:49 ` Features vs infrastructure (was Re: Tracepoint support in Cygnus GDB ?) Stan Shebs
2003-10-02 3:29 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-10-02 3:47 ` Stan Shebs
2003-10-02 5:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-02 6:42 ` Stan Shebs
2003-10-02 7:02 ` Joel Brobecker
2003-10-02 19:18 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-02 6:04 ` Stan Shebs
2003-10-02 6:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-30 5:43 ` Tracepoint support in Cygnus GDB ? Jim Blandy
2003-09-30 21:14 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F7B9B85.50201@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=eliz@elta.co.il \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=shebs@apple.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).