From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24207 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2003 03:44:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24192 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2003 03:44:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cybertec.com.au) (144.137.98.161) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2003 03:44:53 -0000 Received: from cybertec.com.au (chris.ct.com.au [10.10.10.193]) by cybertec.com.au (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h923ieY20539; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 13:44:41 +1000 Message-ID: <3F7B9F28.4020103@cybertec.com.au> Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 03:44:00 -0000 From: Chris Johns Organization: http://www.cybertec.com.au/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Using gdb with Borland's free compiler? References: <200309282250.h8SMorcf026975@duracef.shout.net> <3F783251.2030009@redhat.com> <3F7A053B.9060502@cybertec.com.au> <3F7AE95C.5020108@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3F7AE95C.5020108@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > > It might be prudent to not look at the existing patch too hard. You'll > need to be able to sign a document stating that what you contribute is > your own work .... > I do not know the Win32 API so makes this a little more effort than I can spare. I have asked about ths history of the patch on the MinGW list. > Alternatively, you could use this list as an audit trail and explain > what needs to be done. Not sure I understand what you mean. Is a list of the current patch changes ok ? I was planing on breaking down the patch and sending them to the gdb patches list. -- Chris Johns, cjohns at cybertec . com . au