From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 170DB397283B for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 19:47:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 170DB397283B Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id q17-20020a17090a2e11b02901757deaf2c8so5163084pjd.0 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:47:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=iZPgQgPakGqA3hBO5TYpipbykYGywJwiP7wBvGCnVS0=; b=UBJKwjvcyDYySzpyzCgx2qf6r2oD6BT2g0t9llA2L7tHW+O2YXzfqwe0WmXNcrK/X0 dPtWjORw8hQjCswBSVXECq7bTI6jF8BunokGu44iBzTMtMvyMOdijO7X6Jdsxvv46I8U rqBvSZsiq8JplFumA1Q38lwbfINeakHyV9PU5fazhayaIhWqxh6tbNP0xoialKT2edjO wgpzzbRspAYViGSwgsn8hXJ6Ob/0pJnlyO62Zkt8y14rdbVVjXwzCeW50pNv0D9aX3K0 r/jiYuss6bfonGoHLfRq2QP+MdzBkvTPVpgpydez+pNGPgSdjfaGSywC6yDP7XiQx9XR XMsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531DAJWeHh6BQ2UG+/ZjDsRGryzKf63CW1FNubMqiJ5+eiirNFd9 we78tgizolzwJdQWz3przVs+hNV/QicOdw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdg/C2fubZU+zwytMZDtPaK/+xQP+NHLH7iZkhds2eTJNYTVRDKYwQ0/S2JEgRkDuiIMbwtA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:48c:: with SMTP id 134mr166142pge.122.1628106455257; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:47:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2804:7f0:4841:25bc:151d:69e7:181e:a2b7? ([2804:7f0:4841:25bc:151d:69e7:181e:a2b7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e3sm3864073pfi.189.2021.08.04.12.47.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:47:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Proposal to Removal of QNX Neutrino support from GDB To: Simon Marchi , Stephen Webb , "gdb@sourceware.org" References: <4205d383-e98e-f591-9031-f48925634c65@polymtl.ca> <44ea4b55-6ba2-77b2-adf4-12faa2fcad9d@polymtl.ca> <9d57a0ab883243e98ae1e357200e34c6@blackberry.com> <85182cc1-d65e-1441-5435-944bf09864f7@polymtl.ca> <508a3095-6635-f030-fbe1-23454615e167@polymtl.ca> <745bb80a-2068-de05-88bb-d6ea04dea829@polymtl.ca> <9c2a6aa76dc942c98022e29b775cc7d8@blackberry.com> From: Luis Machado Message-ID: <3d26fb37-982a-3c97-a000-c76abd3660d6@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 16:47:31 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 19:47:39 -0000 On 8/4/21 2:21 PM, Simon Marchi via Gdb wrote: > On 2021-08-04 11:14 a.m., Stephen Webb wrote: >> I am still wrestling with internal demons on this, I apologise for the >> silence. I should have some basic binutils patches soon as a first step. > > No worries, as long as we get regular updates to know the project is not > dead. > >> On that topic, are binutils changes handled the same as gdb changes or >> are they a separate process? The history is very confusing. > > The process is roughly the same, only that the patches are sent to > binutils@sourceware.org instead of gdb-patches@sourceware.org. Also, > make sure your copyright assignment covers both projects (GDB and > binutils). > > A small difference in process is that we don't use ChangeLog entries in > GDB anymore, whereas binutils still uses them. master binutils has abolished ChangeLogs as well. https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-June/117016.html Confirmed by H.J. here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-August/117591.html