public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Koning <paulkoning@comcast.net>
To: Jason Long <hack3rcon@yahoo.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Is GDB just for bug hunting?
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:48:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40861674-D931-44C6-A4CE-50DC6516DEDF@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <380743744.1194751.1618425458396@mail.yahoo.com>



> On Apr 14, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Jason Long <hack3rcon@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> Thank you for your useful info.
> If a program is close source, then code review canceled. Thus, how a security researcher finds a vulnerability in a program?

Agreed, code review only applies if the source is visible.  More precisely, if the source is allowed to be disclosed; researchers looking at the code while under NDA does not count and serves no significant purpose.

In those case, you're left with test stimuli and reverse engineering.  For "never seen before" defects, you either need luck (an existing test happens to catch it) or a different kind of luck (you created a new test that happens to catch it) or lots of skill (you saw the issue during a reverse engineering session).

GDB can help with reverse engineering.  It's probably not ideal for disassembly let alone decompiling, but it does offer disassembly and it also gives you insight into the state of the running application and how it changes during execution.

	paul


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-14 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <581661034.1177110.1618422536149.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
2021-04-14 17:48 ` Jason Long
2021-04-14 18:02   ` Paul Koning
2021-04-14 18:37     ` Jason Long
2021-04-14 18:48       ` Paul Koning [this message]
2021-04-14 19:05         ` Joel Sherrill
2021-04-15  8:24         ` Jason Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40861674-D931-44C6-A4CE-50DC6516DEDF@comcast.net \
    --to=paulkoning@comcast.net \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hack3rcon@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).