From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Technical criteria for retaining symbol readers
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40D70123.9060308@gnu.org> (raw)
Hello,
I'd like to see us establish clear technical criteria against which
symtab readers are measured. Those that don't meet the criteria, either
being fixed or removed.
As an example, should it be a requirement that all symbol-readers use
the build-symtab framework?
Andrew
next reply other threads:[~2004-06-21 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-21 15:39 Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-06-23 18:44 ` Jim Blandy
2004-06-23 19:50 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-06-23 20:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-06-28 23:59 ` Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40D70123.9060308@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).