From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10398 invoked by alias); 25 Aug 2004 15:57:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10390 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2004 15:57:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO barry.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.25) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2004 15:57:24 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1C008o-0003xi-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:56:50 -0400 Received: from mindspring.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DD0D4B102; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:56:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:57:00 -0000 From: Michael Chastain To: gdb@sources.redhat.com, bob@brasko.net Subject: Re: GDB/MI Output Syntax Message-ID: <412CB6B6.nail1DX11BPYQ@mindspring.com> References: <20040825154348.GA19533@white> In-Reply-To: <20040825154348.GA19533@white> User-Agent: nail 10.8 6/28/04 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00374.txt.bz2 Bob Rossi wrote: > Does this sound reasonable? and again, should I post a new grammar with > the new lines moved to the 'output' production and with the changes I > have above? I'd love to see your grammar posted.