From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18465 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2004 20:10:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18442 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2004 20:10:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2004 20:10:20 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i96KA429010491 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:10:14 -0400 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i96K9xr12894; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:09:59 -0400 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB9F28D2; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:09:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <41645106.1060106@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 20:13:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-GB; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040831 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Rossi Cc: GDB Subject: Re: probing GDB for MI versions References: <20041003170104.GC7030@white> <41644306.2090603@gnu.org> <20041006191950.GP12213@white> In-Reply-To: <20041006191950.GP12213@white> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00185.txt.bz2 > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:09:58PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >>> If a current GDB were modified to list mi "versions" then it would only >>> print mi2, which is the version selected by -i=mi. If your front end >>> specifies -i=mi1 then you're on your own - it's not tested - it doesn't >>> work. > > > WHAT?!? This is what I have been asking all along? It was the foundation > to this conversation. Where were you to inform everyone of this? s/everyone/you/. I've been reading the thread. > Are you saying that old versions of MI are not supported by GDB? Only > the last official release of the MI protocol is supported and that no > other versions that it used to speak with are supported or tested? I'm simply pointing out the obvious - what we don't test [likely] doesn't work. I certainly wouldn't be putting the sheep station(1) on this one, given such odds. Andrew (1) Farm