From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25414 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2004 14:51:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25388 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2004 14:51:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Nov 2004 14:51:41 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iA9EpUI0025782 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:51:36 -0500 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (to-dhcp51.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.151]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iA9EpPr12452; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:51:25 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31BC129D8C; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:50:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4190D933.5070006@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 14:56:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041020) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Is skip_prologue_using_sal actually usable? References: <200411071355.iA7DtfTE002934@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200411071355.iA7DtfTE002934@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 Mark, DWARF 2 provides us with the exact location[s] of a prologue end, can we use that? skip_prologue, just like the traditional unwinder, only has to be ``good enough''. Andrew