From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27657 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2004 22:13:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26379 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2004 22:11:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gizmo08ps.bigpond.com) (144.140.71.18) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2004 22:11:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 17794 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2004 22:11:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO psmam12.bigpond.com) (144.135.25.103) by gizmo08ps.bigpond.com with SMTP; 10 Nov 2004 22:11:53 -0000 Received: from cpe-203-51-247-200.qld.bigpond.net.au ([203.51.247.200]) by psmam12.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 228/2276624) with SMTP id 2276624; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:11:53 +1000 Message-ID: <41929228.4040608@neurizon.net> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:53:00 -0000 From: Steven Johnson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Schneider, Jan (GE51)" CC: "'gdb@sources.redhat.com'" Subject: Re: set architecture for MPC8xx References: <938F1554888BD71194E100B0D0FCD97201AAD7E2@ge51smail2.ge51.honeywell.de> In-Reply-To: <938F1554888BD71194E100B0D0FCD97201AAD7E2@ge51smail2.ge51.honeywell.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00099.txt.bz2 Your target stub needs to support the "Architecture" otherwise it wont know how to set or get the values of the registers. If the target stub only reports/handles registers for the "generic" architecture, you will need to change it to handle all of the other registers. Steven Schneider, Jan (GE51) wrote: >Hello, > >I have tried the "set architecture" command for the powerpc MPC8xx. After >this I see a lot of new registers. >But for me it seems that these registers aren't really taking effects after >changing their values. >I found them in rs6000-tdep.c. > >Is there a way to use these additional registers sensible? > >thanks > > > >