From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15617 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2005 15:00:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15356 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2005 15:00:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nimbus.ott.qnx.com) (209.226.137.76) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2005 15:00:26 -0000 Received: from [10.12.1.181] (dhcpa181.ott.qnx.com [10.12.1.181]) by nimbus.ott.qnx.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id H1Q5J314; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:00:26 -0500 Message-ID: <423AED09.1080308@qnx.com> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:00:00 -0000 From: Kris Warkentin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: GDB Subject: Re: Possibly dumb signal mapping question References: <20050318145234.GA24185@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20050318145234.GA24185@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00184.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >No, there isn't - you could do it in your remote protocol target (don't >you >use a different protocol?) > Yeah. I just created some mapping functions to apply whenever the signal is sent or received on the wire. It's in the remote part of our port that I haven't submitted yet. I'm waiting for some time where I won't keep getting pre-empted. It's annoying when I submit something to you guys and then can't devote my full attention to following up. cheers, Kris