From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19281 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2005 19:42:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19237 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Oct 2005 19:42:42 -0000 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (HELO mail-out4.apple.com) (17.254.13.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 19:42:42 +0000 Received: from relay6.apple.com (a17-128-113-36.apple.com [17.128.113.36]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j97JfUJh029957; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 12:41:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [17.219.213.253] (unknown [17.219.213.253]) by relay6.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 9630B1C5; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 12:41:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4346CF6B.1010000@apple.com> Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 19:42:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Open projects list References: <4346CB8C.10800@apple.com> <20051007193012.GA31596@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20051007193012.GA31596@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:25:00PM -0700, Stan Shebs wrote: > >>I was poking around to see if named threads was written down anywhere >>as a desired GDB feature, and couldn't find it on web pages or in >>sources, which makes me wonder how many other longstanding wishlist >>items aren't known about. I see that there are lots of feature >>requests in bugzilla, but they are more about specific details, >>rather than overall direction, and IMHO the bugzilla format is not >>so helpful for larger or architectural changes that may need lengthy >>background and explanation, like MI levels to support, reverse >>execution infrastructure, native tracepoints, etc. GCC has a >>whole collection of pages under http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/ for >>this kind of thing. >> >>Does anybody else think we need something like this? >> > >If we want something like this, a Wiki would be a better choice. GCC >certainly found their wiki to be more effective than the projects >pages, which are mostly translations of old projects from the source >distribution. > Heh, good idea, "Mr. 22,000-edits-on-Wikipedia" should have thought of that... Stan