From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1412 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2005 15:19:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1315 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Oct 2005 15:19:04 -0000 Received: from shadow.prohost.de (HELO shadow.prohost.de) (216.71.84.228) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:19:03 +0000 Received: from mail.lipieda (p54A755F8.dip.t-dialin.net [84.167.85.248]) by shadow.prohost.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j9RFIxQ04184 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:19:00 +0200 Received: from [192.168.129.50] (unknown [192.168.129.50]) by mail.lipieda (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538C1565A for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:18:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4360EFE7.6030406@lipowsky.de> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:19:00 -0000 From: Efim Monjak User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: break of time loop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2 Hier a part of transcript and a part of ethereal protocol. they are from different sessions but I think it is the same case. The ctrl+c is sent before "step" command is responsed. The response for "step" is recognised as response for ctrl+c, possibly the trap signal don't means the loop processing is stopped. After it next "step" command is sent and the response for ctrl+c, which is sent at the same time with interrupt signal, is ignored. I hope you can understand my english:) 000004BD 2b + 000004BE 24 73 23 37 33 $s#73 000022E2 2b + 000022E3 24 54 30 35 30 42 3a 45 43 33 44 30 30 34 30 3b $T050B:E C3D0040; 000022F3 30 44 3a 44 43 33 44 30 30 34 30 3b 30 46 3a 36 0D:DC3D0 040;0F:6 00002303 38 30 31 30 30 34 30 3b 23 38 43 8010040; #8C 000004C3 2b + 000004C4 24 73 23 37 33 $s#73 0000230E 2b + 0000230F 24 54 30 35 30 42 3a 45 43 33 44 30 30 34 30 3b $T050B:E C3D0040; 0000231F 30 44 3a 44 43 33 44 30 30 34 30 3b 30 46 3a 36 0D:DC3D0 040;0F:6 0000232F 43 30 31 30 30 34 30 3b 23 39 37 C010040; #97 000004C9 2b + 000004CA 24 73 23 37 33 $s#73 0000233A 2b + 000004CF 03 . 0000233B 24 54 30 35 30 42 3a 45 43 33 44 30 30 34 30 3b $T050B:E C3D0040; 0000234B 30 44 3a 44 43 33 44 30 30 34 30 3b 30 46 3a 35 0D:DC3D0 040;0F:5 0000235B 38 30 31 30 30 34 30 3b 23 38 42 8010040; #8B 000004D0 2b + 000004D1 24 73 23 37 33 $s#73 00002366 24 54 30 32 30 42 3a 45 43 33 44 30 30 34 30 3b $T020B:E C3D0040; 00002376 30 44 3a 44 43 33 44 30 30 34 30 3b 30 46 3a 35 0D:DC3D0 040;0F:5 00002386 38 30 31 30 30 34 30 3b 23 38 38 8010040; #88 000004D6 2b + 000004D7 24 73 23 37 33 $s#73 00002391 2b + 00002392 24 54 30 35 30 42 3a 45 43 33 44 30 30 34 30 3b $T050B:E C3D0040; 000023A2 30 44 3a 44 43 33 44 30 30 34 30 3b 30 46 3a 35 0D:DC3D0 040;0F:5 000023B2 43 30 31 30 30 34 30 3b 23 39 36 C010040; #96 000004DC 2b + 000004DD 24 73 23 37 33 $s#73 000023BD 2b + 000023BE 24 54 30 35 30 42 3a 45 43 33 44 30 30 34 30 3b $T050B:E C3D0040; 000023CE 30 44 3a 44 43 33 44 30 30 34 30 3b 30 46 3a 36 0D:DC3D0 040;0F:6 000023DE 30 30 31 30 30 34 30 3b 23 38 34 0010040; #84 000004E2 2b + Sending packet: $s#73...Ack Packet received: T050B:EC3D0040;0D:DC3D0040;0F:6C010040; Sending packet: $s#73...Ack Packet received: T050B:EC3D0040;0D:DC3D0040;0F:58010040; Sending packet: $s#73...Ack remote_interrupt called remote_stop called Packet received: T050B:EC3D0040;0D:DC3D0040;0F:5C010040; Sending packet: $s#73...Packet instead of Ack, ignoring it Sending packet: $s#73...Ack Packet received: T050B:EC3D0040;0D:DC3D0040;0F:60010040; Sending packet: $s#73...Ack Packet received: T050B:EC3D0040;0D:DC3D0040;0F:64010040; Sending packet: $s#73...Ack Packet received: T050B:EC3D0040;0D:DC3D0040;0F:68010040;