From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2846 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2005 10:42:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2781 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2005 10:42:19 -0000 Received: from shadow.prohost.de (HELO shadow.prohost.de) (216.71.84.228) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 10:42:19 +0000 Received: from mail.lipieda (p54A76044.dip.t-dialin.net [84.167.96.68]) by shadow.prohost.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jA3AgGo18737 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:42:16 +0100 Received: from [192.168.129.50] (unknown [192.168.129.50]) by mail.lipieda (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05363565A for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:42:16 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4369E990.9060305@lipowsky.de> Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 10:42:00 -0000 From: Efim Monjak User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: break of time loop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 Hi all, is there a particular time between send a "step" command and ctrl+c. I see the ctrl+c charakter on different place depend on performanse of target. If I set a big delay before send "step" response I see about 1 sec. between "step" command and ctrl+c. Signal Interrupt which stops the time loop after ctrl+c don't stops the loop if ctrl+c is received after "stop" response but to close to next "step" command to send a special responce to ctrl+c. In this case next "step" is responced with interrupt signal. But the loop will not be stopped. -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen Efim Monjak Lipowsky Industrie-Elektronik GmbH 64291 Darmstadt, Roemerstr. 57 Telefon: +49-(0)6151-93591-0 Telefax: +49-(0)6151-93591-28 Email: ymonyak@lipowsky.de Homepage: http://www.lipowsky.de DIN EN ISO 9001:2000 certified by DQS