From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24521 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2005 14:16:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24511 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Nov 2005 14:16:08 -0000 Received: from fra-del-01.spheriq.net (HELO fra-del-01.spheriq.net) (195.46.51.97) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:16:08 +0000 Received: from fra-out-02.spheriq.net (fra-out-02.spheriq.net [195.46.51.130]) by fra-del-01.spheriq.net with ESMTP id jA7EG2kt022684 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:16:02 GMT Received: from fra-cus-01.spheriq.net (fra-cus-01.spheriq.net [195.46.51.37]) by fra-out-02.spheriq.net with ESMTP id jA7EFrDE013844 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:15:56 GMT Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by fra-cus-01.spheriq.net with ESMTP id jA7EFqq8028771 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:15:52 GMT Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (ns2.st.com [164.129.230.9]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 8F282DA4D; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:15:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics, from userid 60012) id 06A76473BA; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:18:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 7DA6475995; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:18:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.bri.st.com (mail1.bri.st.com [164.129.8.218]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id C9052473BC; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:18:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [164.129.15.13] (terrorhawk.bri.st.com [164.129.15.13]) by mail1.bri.st.com (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id CGG00989 (AUTH "andrew stubbs"); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:15:44 GMT Message-ID: <436F610C.5080508@st.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:16:00 -0000 From: Andrew STUBBS User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: GDB as a loader 3/3: --eval-command option References: <4354DD31.3020809@st.com> <436B4B87.1060801@st.com> <20051105025059.GB20989@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080404040901050506050701" X-O-Spoofed: Not Scanned X-O-General-Status: No X-O-Spam1-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Spam2-Status: Not Scanned X-O-URL-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Virus1-Status: No X-O-Virus2-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Virus3-Status: No X-O-Virus4-Status: No X-O-Virus5-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Image-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Attach-Status: Not Scanned X-SpheriQ-Ver: 4.1.07 X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00149.txt.bz2 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080404040901050506050701 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-length: 630 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>Should this, or the others, be in NEWS? > > > Good point. Yes, I think all the new command-line options should be > mentioned in NEWS. Andrew, could you please write that up and post > here for approval? On looking at the NEWS files more closely I am a little uncertain what to do about the mainline file. The attached patch should do fine for the 6.4 branch however (I don't think this needs any more, does it?). The mainline does not contain anything about 6.4 yet. Presumably this will be merged across when the 6.4 stuff is completed? Should I add a 6.5 section for my changes? Andrew Stubbs --------------080404040901050506050701 Content-Type: text/plain; name="6.4-news.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="6.4-news.patch" Content-length: 473 2005-11-07 Andrew Stubbs * NEWS: Add --batch-silent option. --- src6.4.orig/NEWS 2005-11-07 14:12:02.000000000 +0000 +++ src6.4/NEWS 2005-11-07 14:12:08.000000000 +0000 @@ -12,6 +12,10 @@ OpenBSD/mips64 mips64-*-openbsd* Morpho Technologies ms1 ms1-elf +* New command line options + +--batch-silent As for --batch, but totally silent. + * Deprecated commands removed The following commands, that were deprecated in 2000, have been --------------080404040901050506050701--