From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1607 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2005 11:45:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 1597 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Nov 2005 11:45:44 -0000 Received: from fra-del-01.spheriq.net (HELO fra-del-01.spheriq.net) (195.46.51.97) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:45:44 +0000 Received: from fra-out-01.spheriq.net (fra-out-01.spheriq.net [195.46.51.129]) by fra-del-01.spheriq.net with ESMTP id jAEBje5w005753 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:45:40 GMT Received: from fra-cus-01.spheriq.net (fra-cus-01.spheriq.net [195.46.51.37]) by fra-out-01.spheriq.net with ESMTP id jAEBjbHE023760 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:45:39 GMT Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by fra-cus-01.spheriq.net with ESMTP id jAEBjZ5L014414 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:45:37 GMT Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (ns2.st.com [164.129.230.9]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 74D42DA46; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:45:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics, from userid 60012) id 33108474A6; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:48:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id E47DA75994; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.bri.st.com (mail1.bri.st.com [164.129.8.218]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 3EB3E474AB; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:48:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [164.129.15.13] (terrorhawk.bri.st.com [164.129.15.13]) by mail1.bri.st.com (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id CGZ17732 (AUTH "andrew stubbs"); Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:45:33 GMT Message-ID: <43787849.6060303@st.com> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:45:00 -0000 From: Andrew STUBBS User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: GDB as a loader 3/3: --eval-command option References: <4354DD31.3020809@st.com> <436B4B87.1060801@st.com> <20051105025059.GB20989@nevyn.them.org> <436F610C.5080508@st.com> <437085AF.9080602@st.com> <20051113173801.GE1945@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20051113173801.GE1945@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-O-Spoofed: Not Scanned X-O-General-Status: No X-O-Spam1-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Spam2-Status: Not Scanned X-O-URL-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Virus1-Status: No X-O-Virus2-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Virus3-Status: No X-O-Virus4-Status: No X-O-Virus5-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Image-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Attach-Status: Not Scanned X-SpheriQ-Ver: 4.1.07 X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00262.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:02:07AM +0000, Andrew STUBBS wrote: > >>Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >>>>Should I add a 6.5 section for my changes? >>> >>> >>>Only if we decide not to commit them to the branch as well. >>>Personally, I don't see why not have them in 6.4, they cannot possibly >>>harm anything. >> >>Anybody object to my putting --return-child-result (including the header >>file update) and --eval-command into 6.4? >> >>Anybody else in favour? > > > Sounds reasonable to me. > Is that an 'OK, go ahead', or just part of the discussion?