From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32208 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2005 17:54:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 32181 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2005 17:54:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from dumbledore.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:54:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 27763 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2005 17:54:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.253.176.44?) (mitchell@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 29 Nov 2005 17:54:14 -0000 Message-ID: <438C95BF.10109@codesourcery.com> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:03:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: Simon Richter , Richard Earnshaw , GDB Subject: Re: ARM RDI References: <438B8FAD.1020804@codesourcery.com> <1133259214.32658.36.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <20051129134436.GA22387@nevyn.them.org> <438C6192.10109@hogyros.de> <20051129142714.GA23172@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20051129142714.GA23172@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00618.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > There are a number of other ways to use RDI besides rdi-share. Indeed. Some of the board vendors also ship GDB<->RDI converters. As you say, I have very little confidence that the current rdi-share actually works with most things. If consensus has been reached to remove rdi-share, may I post a patch for review? Or, if we don't think we can get that consensus, how about at least a patch to make it a configure-time option, off by default? -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC mark@codesourcery.com (916) 791-8304