From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 382 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2005 16:26:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 347 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Sep 2005 16:26:27 -0000 Received: from smtp.terra.es (HELO tsmtp3.ldap.isp) (213.4.129.129) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 16:26:27 +0000 Received: from [192.168.110.193] ([195.53.197.70]) by tsmtp3.ldap.isp (terra.es) with ESMTP id IMELNZ00.QE7; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 18:26:23 +0200 Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 16:26:00 -0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?B?TWlndWVsIEEuIE518WV6?= Reply-To: Miguel Angel Message-ID: <481064362500.20050906182618@terra.es> To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re[2]: General purpose registers not in core file In-Reply-To: <20050906154326.GB3270@nevyn.them.org> References: <1971061556421.20050906173932@terra.es> <591061671484.20050906174127@terra.es> <20050906154326.GB3270@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2 Thank you Daniel. My executable is a 64-bit one. Does this make any difference? Should I use a 64-bit gdb binary? Tuesday, September 6, 2005, 5:43:26 PM, usted escribió: DJ> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 05:41:27PM +0200, Miguel A. Nuñez wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to debug a core file but I always get this error (multit is my executable) >> >> [/export/home/miguel]$ gdb multit core >> GNU gdb 6.0 >> This GDB was configured as "sparc-sun-solaris2.9"... DJ> Try using a more recent version of GDB, which has better Solaris DJ> support. DJ> You may also want a 64-bit GDB binary.